what contribution did the stamp act episode make to the colonists’ concept of liberty
Hitler's Early Views On The Jews - A Critique
History Articles
Hitler's Early Views On The Jews
A Critique
By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2010
Articles May Be Reproduced But With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Jew News (SM)
Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation! HERE
Or Ship Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, PO Box 547, Priest River ID 83856
Email: bronathanael@yahoo.com
_____________________________
AS We EXPLORE a sampling of Hitler's early views on the Jews, we shall discover striking parallels to conditions existing in our own day.
Jewish propagandists would accept united states believe that Hitler'south unfavorable mental attitude toward Jewry was based solely on a "racial" hostility between Aryans and the Jewish people.
Only as nosotros examine Hitler's early views regarding the Jewish Question, we do non find a predominantly racial line of disputation, but rather, a social line of argumentation.
Although the hereafter Führer did identify Jewry equally having a "racial grapheme" formed by centuries of Jewish insulation within their host nations, he did non ground his opposition on genetic predetermination. Thus, the accusation that Hitler was a "racist" is a Jewish lie.
Beginning with a letter written in 1919 in reply to an inquirer on the subject field of Jewry'due south influence in the Weimar Republic, Hitler stressed the need for a rational basis for anti-Semitism that would oppose the ethos and deportment of Jewry:
"Anti-Semitism as a political motion cannot be defined by emotional impulses but by recognition of the facts. The facts are these: First, Jewry is absolutely a race and not a religious association.
Jews never designate themselves every bit Jewish Germans, Jewish Poles, or Jewish Americans - simply e'er every bit German, Smoothen, or American Jews.
Through thousands of years of the closest kind of inbreeding, Jews have maintained their peculiarities far more distinctly than many of the peoples among whom they take lived.
Thus there lives amongst us an conflicting race that neither wishes to neither cede its racial character nor deny its feeling, thinking, and striving. Nevertheless, it possesses all the political rights we do.
If the ethos of the Jews is revealed in the purely textile realm, it is fifty-fifty clearer in their thinking and striving. In their trip the light fantastic toe around the golden calf the value of the individual is no longer decided by his character but by the size of his fortune.
The loftiness of a nation is no longer to be measured past the sum of its moral and spiritual powers, but rather by the wealth of its cloth possessions.
This thinking and striving later on coin and power, and the feelings that keep with it, serve the purposes of the Jew who is unscrupulous in the choice of methods and pitiless in their employment.
His ability is the power of money, which multiplies in his hands through interest, and which forces peoples under the near dangerous of yokes. Its aureate glitter, so attractive in the start, conceals the ultimately tragic consequences.
Everything men strive after as a higher goal, exist it religion, socialism, democracy, is to the Jew only means to an end, the way to satisfy his lust for gold and domination.
In his effects and consequences he is like a racial cancer of the nations.
Thus, an anti-Semitism based purely on emotional grounds volition find its ultimate expression in the form of the pogrom.
But an anti-Semitism based on reason must pb to a systematic legal elimination of the privileges of the Jews. The ultimate objective of such legislation must, however, exist the irrevocable removal of the Jews from civil and cultural influence.
To this end, the installation of nationally-minded leadership personalities with an inner sense of responsibility is necessary." View Unabridged Story Hither.
Conspicuously, HITLER OUTLINED a "social" problem posed by Jewry in its materialistic pursuits that acted as a "cancer" upon Germany. This could only exist eliminated by denying the Jews civil and cultural influence through legal means.
As mentioned above, the relevance of Hitler's early on views on the Jews to today's Jewish problem is to be considered.
The question must be asked: Is a legal denial of Jewry'southward pernicious influence on society the means of ridding ourselves of the Jewish menace?
WHEN DESCRIBING IN 1924 his early thoughts on Jewry, Hitler established in the opening chapters of Mein Kampf a formative model for his anti-Jewish polemic.
This model was fix along not in racial terms, but over again, based on the activities pursued by Jewry, which Hitler viewed as destructive to the culture and destiny of Germany.
First, permit us explore an "encounter" the future Führer experienced with a religious Jew while walking the streets of Vienna when still a young creative person which acted equally a catalyst for his ensuing opposition to Jewry:
"In the Jew I saw only a human who was of a different religion, and therefore, on grounds of human tolerance, was against the idea that he should be attacked because he had a different organized religion.
One time, when passing through the inner metropolis of Vienna, I suddenly encountered a miracle in a long caftan and wearing black side-locks.
My start thought was: 'Is this a Jew? They certainly did not take this appearance in Linz.'
But the longer I gazed at the strange countenance and examined it feature by feature, the more the question shaped itself in my listen: 'Is this a German?'" View Unabridged Story Here.
IT WAS AT THIS JUNCTURE that Hitler began to consider the part of the Jew in Germany's cultural life:
"As presently as I began to investigate the matter and notice the Jews, then Vienna appeared to me in a different light.
What soon gave me cause for very serious consideration were the activities of the Jews in certain branches of life. Was at that place whatever undertaking, whatsoever form of foulness, especially in cultural life, in which at least one Jew did non participate?
I discovered the Jewish activities in the press, in art, in literature and the theatre. One needed only to look at the posters announcing the hideous productions of the cinema and report the names of the authors in order to become permanently adamant on Jewish questions.
Here was a pestilence with which the public was being infected. I began to advisedly investigate the names of all the fabricators of these unclean products. The result of that inquiry was still more disfavourable to the attitude to which I had hitherto held in regard to the Jews.
The fact that nine-tenths of all the smutty literature, artistic tripe and theatrical banalities, had to be charged to the business relationship of people who formed scarcely one per cent of the nation - that fact could not be gainsaid." View Entire Story Here & Here.
NO HINT of racial profiling here, dear readers. And as the proverb goes, "Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose."
For although Hitler did try to change the cultural degradation perpetrated by German Jewry - the moral depravity remains the same throughout the Western earth.
Perchance some other "führer" who understands "legalities" volition arise and apply some Sometime Deutsch Cleanser one time again…
Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!
Or Ship Your Contribution To:
The Blood brother Nathanael Foundation, PO Box 547, Priest River ID 83856
Email: bronathanael@yahoo.com
___________________________________
For More Meet: Will A New Hitler Arise? Click Here
And: How The Jews Prompted A High german Backlash Click Here
And: Will A Armed services Coup Salvage America? Click Hither
And: Did Hitler Have Reason To Hate The Jews? Click Here
And: The Judaic Destruction Of Western Culture Click Hither
CLICK: Brother Nathanael! Street Evangelist!
Support Brother Nathanael! HERE
Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856
Email: bronathanael@yahoo.com
Brother Nathanael @ November 14, 2010
Source: https://www.realjewnews.com/?p=572
Post a Comment for "what contribution did the stamp act episode make to the colonists’ concept of liberty"